Non-State Actors in International Climate Change Negotiations: A Synthesis
نویسنده
چکیده
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have, over the past decades, come to play a central role in international environmental negotiations. While this growing NGO participation has attracted considerable academic interest, scant attention has to date been paid to the strategic decisions of NGOs before and during actual negotiations: When do they decide to become active in international politics? How do they seek to influence decision making, what strategies and activities do they pursue? I see NGOs as rational, resource-constrained actors, and analyse their behaviour in international climate change negotiations in four independent papers, using data from interviews, documents, and a survey I conducted in 2011. In the four papers, summarised in this synthesis paper, I first compare the participation of indigenous peoples organisations (IPOs) in the climate change and biodiversity negotiations to understand when NGOs become active in international negotiations. I then turn to the behaviour of NGOs during the climate summits, and examine what advocacy strategies NGOs pursue, differentiating between an insider and an outsider strategy. Finally, I look more closely at one insider strategy—direct contacts with negotiators—and one outsider strategy—press conferences. With regard to the former, I ask which governments NGOs contact, and why. As regards press conferences, I focus on governments and analyse which type of governments communicate to the public through press briefings, and why. With these papers, the dissertation sheds light on the participation of non-governmental actors in multilateral climate negotiations, relating NGO behaviour to factors at the organisational and institutional levels.
منابع مشابه
Multilateralism after the Failure of the DDR and Climate Change Negotiations
This paper examines the two most important current efforts to devise new rules binding all nations the negotiations in the WTO of trade rules and the negotiations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to devise rules restricting the annual emissions of greenhouse gases. Both negotiations have failed after several years of intensive effort. There are remarkable parallels in these ...
متن کاملDomestic Politics and Participation in Transnational Climate Governance: The Crucial Case of China
Transnational governance is increasingly important to many areas of global politics, including global climate change, where multilateral negotiations have fallen into gridlock. However, we have yet to fully understand how domestic political conditions affect suband non-state actors’ ability to engage in governance beyond the state. Existing approaches to transnational governance emphasize, ofte...
متن کاملA balance of bottom-up and top-down in linking climate policies
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE | VOL 4 | DECEMBER 2014 | www.nature.com/natureclimatechange The top-down approach to mitigating climate change as exemplified by the UNFCCC negotiations and the Kyoto Protocol has all but stalled, due to a panoply of political objections. To craft a more workable policy, states and non-state actors alike have shifted their focus to bottom-up ‘linkage’ of multinational, na...
متن کاملCoalition strategies in the climate negotiations: an analysis of mountain-related coalitions
This paper investigates the process of coalition formation for issue-specific coalitions. I use the Alliance of Small Island States and the Coalition for Rainforest Nations as case studies to inductively create a framework on coalition formation. This framework is tested against two coalitions, both advocating for mountain issues in the UN climate negotiations. These two coalitions differ in th...
متن کاملDeterminants of bargaining success in the climate change negotiations
A novel dataset, combining interview data with negotiation delegates and hand-coded data of delegate statements, was used to empirically test six hypotheses about the determinants of bargaining success in the UNFCCC negotiations. The success of a state’s bargaining strategy was evaluated by first measuring the distance from a state’s original position on 8 policy issues (e.g. emissions reductio...
متن کامل